Git merge unmerged files

Add a comment. Mahesh Hegde Mahesh Hegde 8 8 silver badges 10 10 bronze badges. Exactly I applied a stash. Now the question is when to use add , when reset and when do I use rm?

For example, I don't want to keep the stashed version but the version from upstream instead? In my case, I found that I need the -f option. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.

Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Stack Gives Back Safety in numbers: crowdsourcing data on nefarious IP addresses.

I repeatedly had the same challenge sometime ago. This problem occurs mostly when you are trying to pull from the remote repository and you have some files on your local instance conflicting with the remote version, if you are using git from an IDE such as IntelliJ, you will be prompted and allowed to make a choice if you want to retain your own changes or you prefer the changes in the remote version to overwrite yours'.

If you don't make any choice then you fall into this conflict. This is probably because you don't have a "remote" named "remote". You have a "remote" named "origin". Think of "remotes" as an alias for the url to your Git server.

So, to get your master branch back in sync, first download the latest content from the git server:. The pull command will do the fetch and merge for you in one step. I ran into the same issue and couldn't decide between laughing or smashing my head on the table when I read this error What git really tries to tell you: "You are already in a merge state and need to resolve the conflicts there first!

You tried a merge and a conflict occured. Then, git stays in the merge state and if you want to resolve the merge with other commands git thinks you want to execute a new merge and so it tells you you can't do this because of your current unmerged files You can leave this state with git merge --abort and now try to execute other commands.

Another potential cause for this Intellij was involved in my case, not sure that mattered though : trying to merge in changes from a main branch into a branch off of a feature branch. I resolved all conflicts and GiT reported unmerged files and I was stuck until I merged from main into feature, then feature into current. Something that happened to me, if you tried to do merge before and resolved some conflicts on the incoming branch, git can do some changes on its own on your current branch, so try git status even if you are sure that no modifications have been made by yourself, then something like this might appear:.

Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. Git merge is not possible because I have unmerged files Ask Question. Asked 5 years, 10 months ago. Active 2 months ago.

Viewed k times. Improve this question. About the hashes you get with git ls-files -u , they are something like: a2d3a1c45eabca8bc29f39dc0 1 file 6a70ebce9fbfff20f8fb 2 file ddd3deade9cb 3 file These are the hashes of the different stages of that file, the blob itself, not of any commit, that's why most git commands won't work on it. Improve this answer. LeGEC: Yes, the stash itself is a commit actually two commits but don't usually refer to those commits directly.

Applying a stash is roughly equivalent to running git cherry-pick stash. The above answers were helpful to understand git better, however I only needed to get the latest commit message of a file in, this turned out to be pretty easy: git log -n 1 HEAD file. Thank you. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name.

Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Stack Gives Back Safety in numbers: crowdsourcing data on nefarious IP addresses. Featured on Meta. New post summary designs on greatest hits now, everywhere else eventually. Related