Microsoft vs citrix

All the Microsoft applications, Office, any company applications, the security, and the profile for each user can be managed from one platform. This means easy, centralised management and ease of use for IT departments. You can even layer Citrix on top of Windows Virtual Desktop, for an extra fee, if your organisation did want to continue with some Citrix capabilities but also WVD. With Citrix on premise the user is presented with a Windows Server OS, which will look very different for those who are switching over from a Windows 10 operating system.

With Windows Virtual Desktop, they see the same Windows 10 desktop. This really helps from a usability perspective as it is very familiar to those already aware of Windows You can control your subscription with management policies and your Virtual desktop and infrastructure managed by Microsoft. You can integrate Microsoft Virtual desktop with your existing desktop apps.

It provides flexibility based on the price. Citrix Virtual Desktop provides a high-quality definition no matter the place where the employee work. The intelligent analytics engine gives ultimate protection to the data. It provides a myriad options and allows to choose many cloud services. Citrix supports a complex active directory CAD to make it more flexible. You can use the Citrix Desktops against multiple cloud platforms.

Citrix is the preponderance option for its ease of image management. It provides both network streaming services and machine creation services. It has a native integration of white image builder as one of its offers. Citrix virtual desktops have a unified communication system to provide a better collaboration experience. It has a Desktop as a Service for deployment and better scalability.

The multi-factor authentication verifies the data security. It allows the services on the different operating systems. You must consider hardware costs and ongoing maintenance costs.

In addition, typically you will need consulting services and ongoing support services from Citrix, which also increase the cost of an enterprise deployment. Compared to Citrix, Windows Virtual Desktop is easier to use for small businesses. While Citrix has many advanced features, the cost of implementation and maintenance is high. However, not all businesses especially small ones need or want to pay for these capabilities.

WVD offers faster and more affordable setup without requiring advanced IT expertise. With Microsoft Windows Virtual Desktop, IT administrators can manage their infrastructure in the cloud, with no need to go to or connect remotely to a server room. WVD lets you manage all Microsoft apps, desktops, business applications, security functions and profiles in one web interface.

To gain additional capabilities offered by Citrix, you can add Citrix on top of WVD see the following section. Citrix provides extensive enterprise security features, including FIPS compliance, Common Criteria certification, Microsoft Credential Guard compliance, multi-factor authentication, smart card integration, ICA proxy, and more.

However, WVD provides adequate security measures based on the strong security features of the Azure cloud. RDP provides a high level of flexibility in that aspect. Citrix has its own decent protocol HDX that minimizes bandwidth requirements , enabling you to use Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops for offices or machines with slower internet connections.

All users share a finite amount of resources on a single RDP server. So, the more users are online, the worse the experience gets. As we mentioned above, Citrix does a better compression of data when transmitting, therefore works better for slower connections.

So, this protocol acts as a buffer between the users and the server, compressing the data in the meantime as well. Even worse, existing users may be cut off without warning!

When a Citrix solution gets near its max capacity, you just need to request more resources. No hassle. Another drawback of RDS or RDP is that you will need third-party apps and client software for accessing the remote desktop from most devices. Most of the time, you need to disable a lot of Windows features just for the RDS to start working. This makes RDS better suited for application virtualization, rather than full desktop virtualization. This is an area where Citrix really shines with years of experience producing virtualization technologies professionally.

The RDP operator must be very skilled. Without essential reserve assistance to be provided in the event of a framework failure, the consequences may be severe. On the other hand, Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops have a fantastic management interface that gives precise control of both the apps and desktops. Users can use their own devices, whether a handheld device or a PC.

RDS requires an always-on connection. If your remote desktop connection fails, your session will too. No warning. No saving. Citrix, however, has a feature called Session Reliability.